[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 14:28:46 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, davem@...emloft.net,
hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
rdunlap@...otime.net, mcgrathr@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
luto@....edu, eparis@...hat.com, serge.hallyn@...onical.com,
djm@...drot.org, scarybeasts@...il.com, indan@....nu, pmoore@...hat.com,
corbet@....net, eric.dumazet@...il.com, markus@...omium.org,
coreyb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, keescook@...omium.org, Oleg Nesterov
<oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 00/15] seccomp_filter: BPF-based syscall filtering
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:11:32 +1100 (EST)
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Will Drewry wrote:
>
> > Please see prior revisions for a detailed discussion of this patch
> > series.
> >
> > This series is a rebase on to:
> > b5174fa3a7f4f8f150bfa3b917c92608953dfa0f
> > with very minor changes due to rebasing and tweaks noticed by a few
> > initial users. (I will rebase again for v3.4-rc1 when that time comes.)
>
> I've offered to take this via my tree -- if anyone else wants to merge it
> via theirs instead, holler.
OK by me, especially if it means that you'll carefully (re)review it! I
had some minor quibbles with v17.
It would be good if Oleg could take a look at the signal changes, if he
has not yet done so?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
