[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:58:35 -0500
From: David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>, Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Ubuntu security discussion <ubuntu-hardened@...ts.ubuntu.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pageexec@...email.hu, spender@...ecurity.net
Subject: Re: Re: Add overflow protection to kref
<snip>
>> Greg, I'm not sure why you're opposed to adding this checking...
>> it's pretty clear that buggy error paths that forget to do a put are
>> pretty common and will continue to be common in new code, and
>> making them harder to exploit seems pretty sane to me.
>>
>> What's the downside?
>
> The downside is that there has not even been a patch sent for any of
> this. Combine that with a lack of understanding about reference
> counting and atomic_t usages in the kernel, and the whole thing is ripe
> for misunderstanding and confusion.
>
> greg k-h
This approach to adding overflow protection to kref uses
atomic_add_unless to increment the refcounter only if it is not
already at INT_MAX. This
leaks the internal representation of atomic_t, which is defined as an
int in linux/types.h, into kref.
If we can agree on an approach to adding overflow protection, if it is
indeed desired, we can then discuss adding a Kconfig option and/or a
sysctl for this protection.
Thanks,
David
Signed-off-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
---
include/linux/kref.h | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kref.h b/include/linux/kref.h
index 9c07dce..fc0756a 100644
--- a/include/linux/kref.h
+++ b/include/linux/kref.h
@@ -38,8 +38,12 @@ static inline void kref_init(struct kref *kref)
*/
static inline void kref_get(struct kref *kref)
{
+ int rc = 0;
WARN_ON(!atomic_read(&kref->refcount));
- atomic_inc(&kref->refcount);
+ smp_mb__before_atomic_inc();
+ rc = atomic_add_unless(&kref->refcount, 1, INT_MAX);
+ smp_mb__after_atomic_inc();
+ BUG_ON(!rc);
}
/**
--
1.7.5.4
--
PGP: 6141 5FFD 11AE 9844 153E F268 7C98 7268 6B19 6CC9
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
