[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:30:49 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
Kees Cook <kees@...ntu.com>, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm: restrict access to /proc/slabinfo
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:27 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 08:41:34PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
>> > Historically /proc/slabinfo has 0444 permissions and is accessible to
>> > the world. slabinfo contains rather private information related both to
>> > the kernel and userspace tasks. Depending on the situation, it might
>> > reveal either private information per se or information useful to make
>> > another targeted attack. Some examples of what can be learned by
>> > reading/watching for /proc/slabinfo entries:
>> > ...
>> > World readable slabinfo simplifies kernel developers' job of debugging
>> > kernel bugs (e.g. memleaks), but I believe it does more harm than
>> > benefits. For most users 0444 slabinfo is an unreasonable attack vector.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com> wrote:
>> Haven't had any mass complaints about the 0400 in Ubuntu (sorry Dave!), so
>> I'm obviously for it.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@...ntu.com>
>
> Looks like the members of the previous slabinfo discussion don't object
> against the patch now and it got two other Reviewed-by responses. Can
> you merge it as-is or should I probably convince someone else?
We discussed this in March (google for 'Make /proc/slabinfo 0400') and
concluded that it's not worth it doesn't really protect from anything
and causes harm to developers.
Pekka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
