Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:30:50 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: jmorris@...ei.org
CC: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, neilb@...e.de, solar@...nwall.com, 
 segoon@...nwall.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de, 
 akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net, 
 kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, jslaby@...e.cz, 
 viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, 
 eparis@...hat.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH] move RLIMIT_NPROC check from set_user() to do_execve_common()

(2011/07/14 9:11), James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
>> It sounds like people are effectively Ack'ing the patch, but with this
>> kind of patch I don't want to add the "implicit Ack" that I often do
>> for regular stuff.
>>
>> So could people who think that the patch is ok in its current form
>> just send me their acked-by or reviewed-by? I haven't heard any actual
>> objection to it, and I think it's valid for the current -rc.
>>
>> Alternatively, feel free to send a comment like "I think it's the
>> right thing, but maybe it should wait for the next merge window"..
> 
> Count me in the latter.
> 
> It does look ok to me, but I'd be happier if it had more testing first (in 
> -mm perhaps).  I think some security folk may be on summer vacation, too.

I don't think I am best person to take ack. but I also don't want to hesitate
to help Solar's good improvemnt.
	Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>

And I'll second James. next mere window is probably safer.

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.