[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 15:44:55 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank.dittrich@...lbox.org>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: OMP vs. OpenCL performance
Am 29.09.2017 um 15:34 schrieb Scott I. Remick:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017, at 03:10 AM, magnum wrote:
>> I presume your hashes are in the order of 500,000 iterations. If not,
>> that's too slow.
>
> I did some research and couldn't find a definitive answer to that, but I
> wouldn't put it beyond Apple to use that many in MacOS in 2017. Perhaps
> someone on this list knows.
Actually, john will provide that information :
Loaded 1 password hash (PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512, GRUB2 / OS X 10.8+
[PBKDF2-SHA512 128/128 AVX 2x])
Cost 1 (iteration count) is 24213 for all loaded hashes
or
Loaded 11 password hashes with 10 different salts (PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512,
GRUB2 / OS X 10.8+ [PBKDF2-SHA512 128/128 AVX 2x])
Loaded hashes with cost 1 (iteration count) varying from 1000 to 37313
Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
