Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:16:13 +0200
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Which is the correct hash?

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:37:06PM +0200, magnum wrote:
> On 2016-08-29 21:00, Sebastian Heyn wrote:
> >-> the pkzip hash brutes at 19k/sec
> >-> the pkzip2 hash brutes at 100/sec (--fork=32 gives x32 speed)

> A more specific answer for your case is that the difference in speed you 
> mention MAY be due to the older version defaulting to "file magic" 
> whereas the newer does not.

Aren't both speeds way lower than expected, though?  The pkzip format
normally benchmarks in the millions.  I guess I am missing something.

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.