[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 15:54:03 +0800
From: ethan <liyishi.ch@...com>
To: john-users <john-users@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Re: 回复： Does JTR support R9 290x GPU.
Hi magnum
Verified. The patch a0b4554 works on the 2 platforms below. Thanks.
1.R9 280x
OpenGL vendor string: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
OpenGL version string: 4.5.13399 Compatibility Profile Context 15.201.1151
OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1800.11)
2. R9 290x
OpenGL renderer string: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
OpenGL version string: 4.5.13416 Compatibility Profile Context 15.302
OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1912.5)
BTW:
It seems AMD GPU has some compatible issues. e.g. The clinfo and john experienced core dump with the combo of SDK3.0 and 15.302 driver.(I think it's caused by SDK)
So how about the NVDIA? Is that more "friendly" :) and I appreciate if you have any suggestion on GPU model selection.
Regards,
Ethan
liyishi.ch@...com
发件人： magnum
发送时间： 2016-01-19 14:55
收件人： john-users
主题： Re: [john-users] 回复： [john-users] Does JTR support R9 290x GPU.
On 2016-01-19 05:20, ethan wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. I have replaced the app SDK from v3.0 to v2.9 and resolved coredump issue.
> What's the version of the fglrx driver you are using? 15.302?
>
> btw:
> The test of oldoffice-opencl was failed. Do you meet the same issue?
> ./john -test -format=oldoffice-opencl
> Device 0: Hawaii [AMD Radeon R9 200 Series]
> Benchmarking: oldoffice-opencl, MS Office <= 2003 [MD5/SHA1 RC4 OpenCL]... FAILED (cmp_all(3))
The oldoffice problem was that a workaround that is *needed* for older
drivers are instead *causing* problems with newer drivers. AMD are the
worst. A workaround was just committed for this in a0b4554.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
