john-users - Re: john-1.7.9-jumbo-6 Solaris x86 build uploaded to the custom builds page--I forgot to update to the wiki page

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:03:10 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: john-1.7.9-jumbo-6 Solaris x86 build uploaded to
 the custom builds page--I forgot to update to the wiki page

On 2012-08-08 03:48, Robert B. Harris wrote:
> In my experience, Solaris is the hardest to statically link.  
> 
> Making sure one has all the static libraries is a pain.
> 
> I'm planning on making a static build of libomp and librt, if that is even
> possible on Solaris.  This recent build doesn't have static rt.
> 
> Are you looking to have a Solaris-omp-static build or something?

Well, if you routinely need to edit the Makefile for the static builds,
we might try to create such target instead. If at all possible.

magnum

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: magnum [mailto:john.magnum@...hmail.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 4:39 PM
> To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
> Subject: Re: [john-users] john-1.7.9-jumbo-6 Solaris x86 build uploaded to
> the custom builds page--I forgot to update to the wiki page
> 
> On 2012-08-07 22:33, Robert B. Harris wrote:
>>   This version is statically linked to OpenSSL v1.0.1c
>>
>> Compiled with gcc v4.6.1
> 
> Robert,
> 
> Is static linking a walk in the park nowadays, or do you have some special
> tweaks you need to apply each time? Bottom line: is there anything we
> could/should change in the main tree?
> 
> magnum
> 
> 
>