john-users - Re: restoration and different date

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:10:15 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: restoration and different date

2011-12-07 22:32, websiteaccess@...il.com wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:19:42 +0100, magnum wrote:
>> By the way your c/s rates are very low. They should be 10 times this
>> speed on a decent CPU. Maybe you are you over-booking your CPU's.
> 
> May be my low speed come from complex rules ?  (Imac I7 2.8 Ghz)
> 
> /[ ] Dp Ap"261165" A0"[0-9][0-9][0-9]" Az"[0-9][0-9][0-9]"
> /[ ] Dp Ap"[0-9][0-9]" A0"[0-9][0-9]" Az"[0-9][0-9]"
> /[ ] Dp Ap"[0-9][0-9][0-9]" A0"[0-9][0-9]" Az"[0-9][0-9][0-9]"
> /[ ] Dp Ap"[0-9][0-9][0-9]" A0"[0-9][0-9][0-9]" Az"[0-9][0-9][0-9]"

Could be. You could try giving john the extra option --mem=2 to force
MPI to split rules instead of words. This will probably be much faster
in this case. Unfortunately you can't change this for an already started
job, you would need to restart it.

magnum