[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 22:32:06 +0100
From: "websiteaccess@...il.com" <websiteaccess@...il.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: restoration and different date
On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:19:42 +0100, magnum wrote:
> 2011-12-07 19:54, websiteaccess@...il.com wrote:
>> I have restored a session
>>
>> Check the date between "( )". That should be the same, no ?
>>
>> iMac-de-xxx-xx:run xxxxxx$ mpirun -np 4 ./john -restore=NTLM
>> Loaded 1 password hash (NT MD4 [128/128 X2 SSE2-16])
>> MPI: each node loaded 1/4 of wordfile to memory (about 23 KB/node)
>> 1: guesses: 0 time: 0:00:30:13 c/s: 3405K trying: 97air002abri959 - 97vol002aide959
>> 0: guesses: 0 time: 0:00:30:13 0.20% (ETA: Sun Dec 18 07:07:59 2011) c/s: 3413K trying: 02note003son522 - 02fine003peu522
>> 2: guesses: 0 time: 0:00:30:13 0.21% (ETA: Sat Dec 17 19:08:32 2011) c/s: 3432K trying: 15vie003mois454 - 15ici003trou454
>> 3: guesses: 0 time: 0:00:30:13 0.21% (ETA: Sat Dec 17 19:08:32 2011) c/s: 3498K trying: 59fete003fil708 - 59lieu003peu708
>>
>
> In some cases it's normal for them to drift apart. In this case I think
> it's just because the percentage is still so low, so the ETA is a very
> rough figure. I bet they will be much closer to each other at 1% or more.
>
> By the way your c/s rates are very low. They should be 10 times this
> speed on a decent CPU. Maybe you are you over-booking your CPU's.
>
> magnum
>
May be my low speed come from complex rules ? (Imac I7 2.8 Ghz)
/[ ] Dp Ap"261165" A0"[0-9][0-9][0-9]" Az"[0-9][0-9][0-9]"
/[ ] Dp Ap"[0-9][0-9]" A0"[0-9][0-9]" Az"[0-9][0-9]"
/[ ] Dp Ap"[0-9][0-9][0-9]" A0"[0-9][0-9]" Az"[0-9][0-9][0-9]"
/[ ] Dp Ap"[0-9][0-9][0-9]" A0"[0-9][0-9][0-9]" Az"[0-9][0-9][0-9]"
W/A/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
