Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:48:24 -0400
From: Erik Winkler <ewinkler@...ls.com>
To: john-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: 1.7.6-jumbo-2

Alexander,

I noticed the following difference between the patched and unpatched 1.7.6 benchmark for LM hashes on OS X.  What does the patch change to cause such a significant difference?  The Traditional DES calculation is not affected, so I am not sure of the cause.

Unpatched:

../run/john -test=10 -format:LM
Benchmarking: LM DES [128/128 BS SSE2-16]... DONE
Raw:	13021K c/s real, 13034K c/s virtual

After applying jumbo patch:

../run/john -test=10 -format:LM
Benchmarking: LM DES [128/128 BS SSE2-16]... DONE
Raw:	10317K c/s real, 10338K c/s virtual

Erik

On Jun 15, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
> 
> 
> As usual, any feedback is welcome.
> 
> Alexander


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.