[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 19:13:40 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Non-iterated SHA-512 OpenCL formats
On 2015-09-13 22:49, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 06:54:07PM +0200, magnum wrote:
>> I see we dropped Myrice's SHA-512 OpenCL formats (in favor of Claudio's)
>> in Issue #676 because it had bugs and no maintainer. I can easily pull
>> them back.
>
> Oh, I don't recall seeing #676 before. I just checked it out, and I see
> that the two of you are working on this already - thank you guys!
>
> https://github.com/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/issues/676
> https://github.com/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/issues/1753
>
> myrice - are you still with us? Your involvement would be helpful.
>
>> I can't see any SHA-256 from Myrice in our history though?
>
> Maybe there wasn't. I only reliably recall testing myrice's
> raw-sha512-opencl and xsha512-opencl during GSoC 2012.
Claudio's raw SHA-512 formats are renamed to -ng again, and Myrice's
formats are now back. I updated them to latest "standards" (don't build
until reset(), latest auto-tune and so on). I'm pretty sure the #676 bug
was squashed in the process.
I haven't touched the kernels yet, they look like reference code.
Probably plenty of low hanging fruit there.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
