[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 12:59:23 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: SHA-1 H()
On 2015-09-03 21:40, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:29:37PM +0200, magnum wrote:
>> On 2015-09-03 20:40, Solar Designer wrote:
>>> I see you've committed this:
>>>
>>> +#if cpu(DEVICE_INFO) || amd_gcn(DEVICE_INFO)
>>> +#define HAVE_ANDNOT 1
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> but I think the check for amd_gcn(DEVICE_INFO) is wrong.
>>
>> We currently never run vectorized on GCN anyway, unless forced by user -
>> if format supports it at all.
>
> That's the SIMD vs. SIMT confusion again.
Oh, right :confused:. That macro wouldn't have any effect though, since
GCN has USE_BITSELECT. But I have now dropped it for GCN. Actually CPUs
also got USE_BITSELECT so any sections for HAVE_ANDNOT are currently
unused but I like to keep them there for the future.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
