Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:45:44 +0800
From: Kai Zhao <loverszhao@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Fuzzing Report on hashes

 > An easy option is to try to start with one bogus hash, say, just one
zero digit.
>
> If it gives you 20x speed-up then yes, to should fuzz each format
separately.
> You can try to fuzz them in parallel. I'm not sure how afl will behave in
this?
> case but it's possible that it will work just fine. Another way is to run
formats
> one after another stopping afl after a timeout.

Thanks, I will fuzz some hashes in separately and in parallel. In order to
fuzz faster, I have add 'return' after john_init(), namely not run
john_run().
Should I do this ? Do I keep fuzzing the valid() part ?


Thanks,

Kai

[ CONTENT OF TYPE text/html SKIPPED ]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ