[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 15:44:31 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: poor man's fuzzer
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 01:50:36PM +0300, Solar Designer wrote:
> Another curious detail is that I couldn't get it to use more than ~4 CPU
> cores on average, not even with hundreds of simultaneous processes,
> until I moved the "run" directory for john to /dev/shm (tmpfs). I guess
> I was bumping into some lock congesion in the kernel, possibly e.g. for
> atime updates of john and john.conf. (If so, remounting the filesystem
> with noatime should probably have helped. I didn't try yet.) So I am
> currently running it in /dev/shm/fuzz, which is a bit risky - in case
> the system gets rebooted, work will be lost. I should revise the script
> to write its log and sample files into a directory different than one it
> invokes john from.
I've just checked - we already have the filesystem mounted noatime.
So the cause of lock contention (or whatever it was) must be different.
Maybe the open of john.pot for writing.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
