[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 02:03:42 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: interleaving in SHA256 & SHA512
On 2015-05-23 04:55, Lei Zhang wrote:
> SIMD_PARA_SHA512 =
> [1]
> Benchmarking: saph, SAP CODVN H (PWDSALTEDHASH) (SHA1x1024) [SHA-1/SHA-2 256/256 AVX2 8x2]... (8xOMP) DONE
> Speed for cost 1 (hash type [1:sha1 2:SHA256 3:SHA384 4:SHA512]) of 1, cost 2 (iteration count) of 1024
> Many salts: 159176 c/s real, 20045 c/s virtual
> Only one salt: 159744 c/s real, 19943 c/s virtual
You need to re-run all those SAP H benchmark in order to actually use
SHA512 at all. Your posted ones list speed for SHA1 only (it says "Speed
for cost 1 of 1" which means SHA-1 according to the "1:sha1".
This is SHA512 speed (on my laptop with para 1):
$ ../run/john -test -form:saph -cost=4:4
Will run 8 OpenMP threads
Benchmarking: saph, SAP CODVN H (PWDSALTEDHASH) (SHA1x1024) [SHA-1/SHA-2
128/128 AVX 4x2]... (8xOMP) DONE
Speed for cost 1 (hash type [1:sha1 2:SHA256 3:SHA384 4:SHA512]) of 4,
cost 2 (iteration count) of 7500
Many salts: 1950 c/s real, 253 c/s virtual
Only one salt: 1861 c/s real, 250 c/s virtual
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
