Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 15:41:11 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank.dittrich@...lbox.org>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [GSoC] John the Ripper support for PHC finalists

On 04/25/2015 01:39 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 04:27:49AM +0200, Agnieszka Bielec wrote:
>> I'm sending more benchmarking tests.
> 
> These are very nice.  Maybe you'd format this spreadsheet such that we
> could export it into a reasonably-looking PDF?  And add descriptions of
> our systems in there (what actual hardware dev=1 corresponds to, etc.)
> Oh, and actual sizes corresponding to the different m_cost settings, in
> kilobytes.  Then we'll "deliver" this as a report to the PHC community.

Do we need to use SALT_SIZE 64 instead of 32 for this?
The impact of salt size might not be comparable zto m_cost/t_cost, but I
doubt it can be ignored.

Frank

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ