Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:06:08 +0200
From: Agnieszka Bielec <bielecagnieszka8@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [GSoC] John the Ripper support for PHC finalists

I added opencl with --cost and I pass m_cost and t_cost by arguments
but now the results are:

[a@...er run]$ ./john --test --format=pomelo-opencl --dev=1 --cost=2:2,2:2
Benchmarking: pomelo-opencl, POMELO [POMELO OpenCL (inefficient,
development use only)]... Device 1: Tahiti [AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series]
Local worksize (LWS) 64, global worksize (GWS) 4096
DONE
Speed for cost 1 (N) of 2, cost 2 (r) of 2
Raw:    87487 c/s real, 9011K c/s virtual

[a@...er run]$ ./john --test --format=pomelo-opencl --dev=5 --cost=2:2,2:2
Benchmarking: pomelo-opencl, POMELO [POMELO OpenCL (inefficient,
development use only)]... Device 5: GeForce GTX TITAN
Local worksize (LWS) 64, global worksize (GWS) 8192
DONE
Speed for cost 1 (N) of 2, cost 2 (r) of 2
Raw:    91022 c/s real, 91872 c/s virtual

It's because now costs are passed like normal arguments and not by
build options as previous
to pass costs by build options I need to compile the kernel in
set_salt or force the user to specify --cost="X:X,Y:Y"
and I don't find any other way.
RAR5's format is a something different to what I need

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ