Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 20:21:32 +0800
From: Kai Zhao <loverszhao@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Extend AFL to fuzz as you want

> Neither bare XML nor scanf-like format strings can express such relations.
> I'm leaning to the idea that we don't want to support such complex
relations between parts of a hash at all.

Get it.

> Talking specifically about fuzzing, when you want to fuzz functions
behind the valid() it's easier to patch this
> specific check out of valid() for now.

If patch this specific check out of valid(), is it matter that we fuzz
functions behind the valid() using invalid hashes?

Thank you.

Kai

[ CONTENT OF TYPE text/html SKIPPED ]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ