Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:43:57 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: descrypt-opencl "section 0" fix

Sayantan, magnum -

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 02:16:09PM +0530, Sayantan Datta wrote:
> On 10/30/13, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
> > These changes in 0c2259b as well as other changes in 1c5e1e5 has not
> > been merged to the bleeding-mask branch because of conflicts. You get to
> > do that. BTW I'm really growing tired of maintaining bleeding-mask,
> > nothing seems to happen there anyway?
> 
> I didn't had much free time lately, so there wasn't much progress in
> the bleeding-mask branch, As  you mentioned earlier CPU mask mode is
> slower than incremental mode, I'll work on that. Also what are our
> expectations with bleeding-mask ? Do we want to release it as jumbo
> someday ?

I don't currently have expectations regarding bleeding-mask.  I need to
find time to release bleeding-jumbo as a new jumbo first, and only then
to look at bleeding-mask more closely.  Depending on what shape I find
it in, yes, it might become a new jumbo release someday (and then it'll
be the base for further jumbo development).

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ