Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 20:19:02 +0200 From: Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: CUDA 2013/9/19 magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>: > I now tried this on my (sm_30) CUDA 5 Macbook. CUDA compilation obviously takes longer as it builds three different versions of each kernel. Unfortunately, and as seen in tests long ago (just changing from sm_10 to sm_20/30) some formats actually get much slower from this. Sorry that I didn't have time to take a look at this. Do we know which code is used in runtime? I guess highest supported by gpu, this is not always the best option, but still better than default sm_10 which we use now just for compatibility with older gpus.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ