Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 16:49:25 +0100
From: Rafael Waldo Delgado Doblas <lord.rafa@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Parallella: Litecoin mining

Hello,

2013/9/6 Yaniv Sapir <yaniv@...pteva.com>

> There is now way to do that, since the instruction op-codes are either
> 32-bit or 16-bit wide, and you have to leave a few bits for the code
> itself...
>

Thank you for your answer, now this looks really clear. Maybe you can tell
me why there is no way to use the registers sequentially in a loop. I
checked a couple of disassembled codes and all times that there is a
sequential access to an array using a loop, the generated code has a lot of
load and store instructions but the unrolled version only uses registers. I
only feel curious about this.


BTW I have run test and finally it's finds a share but unfortunately there
something wrong because it was rejected, at least there wasn't a segfault.
Rejected 00000000 Diff 0/63 EPI 0  (target-miss)

Regards,
Rafa.

Content of type "text/html" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ