[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:04:58 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Parallella: bcrypt
Hi Katja,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:09:33PM +0200, Katja Malvoni wrote:
> I moved all communication to shared memory and now it cracks BF_tst.in
> completely. I was using local memory locations which were overwritten with
> other data during bcrypt computation so some cores didn't have correct key
> and salt although correct data was transferred.
> Code is in https://github.com/kmalvoni/JohnTheRipper/tree/master
That's great news. What speed are you getting now?
Can you also test using password.lst and
http://openwall.info/wiki/_media/john/pw-fake-unix.gz from
http://openwall.info/wiki/john/sample-hashes ? Since password.lst
changed since that file was generated, not all hashes should get cracked -
please test on your desktop system first to know what the right number
of successful guesses is.
Thanks,
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
