[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 15:05:35 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Enhancements to pbkdf2-sha256
On 7 May, 2013, at 9:35 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:10:39AM +0200, magnum wrote:
>> We currently benchmark a mix of test vectors :-/
>
> We only use first two salts for benchmarking, which currently (in
> aix_ssha_fmt.c in bleeding) correspond to {ssha1}06. That's just 128
> SHA-1's, right? I am surprised the speed is not higher.
I guess the figures are from some kind of suboptimal (MSVC?) 32-bit build so only the relative figures are interesting. My unmodified aix-ssha does 12990 c/s versus Jim's original figure of 4629. Optimistically hoping for same relative boost, I'd get 207543K c/s with SSE2 which would translate to over 27M SHA1/s. That's better that Tavis' raw-sha1 (like it should).
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
