[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 20:35:10 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: formats failing test on big-endian
On 6 Feb, 2013, at 15:35 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> I built unstable-jumbo on debian_etch_sparc_small.qcow2 from
> http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/qemu/
Emulating a Sparc on x86? Cool, we were just discussing that today.
> For comparison, 1.7.9-jumbo-7 took 40 minutes. Looks like we've almost
> doubled the amount of code, or at least complexity for the compiler.
>
> After fixing the [21] vs. [22] issue for the revised MSCHAPv2 and
> NETNTLM formats, there are still plenty of formats failing tests -
> although none are crashing the program anymore:
> (...)
I came up with the exact same list today, using a 15 years old Sparc 32 (it's probably slower than QEMU on a decent machine). But I got a segfault in VMS in line 525 of uaf_decode_plug.c. Could not find any reason for that.
I actually feared worse results. I will fix some of them. The MSSQL, Office and RAR problems are in Unicode conversions, this is trivial.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
