Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 23:59:23 +0400
From: Alexander Cherepanov <cherepan@...me.ru>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Static analysis of John using Coverity

On 2012-09-14 03:14, Solar Designer wrote:
> Jumbo's code quality is too low.  (The core tree's could be
> improved as well, to be fair.)  Well, maybe some of the positives will
> make us identify and patch specific bugs... while keeping the overall
> quality almost as low.

Do you have in mind some specific directions in which jumbo could be
improved? Wish-list wiki page mostly lists desired features, maybe it's
worth to make a list of wishes regarding code quality.

BTW do you have any plans regarding integrating parts of the jumbo into
the core?

I'm curious...

-- 
Alexander Cherepanov

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ