Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 05:58:21 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: memory usage (was: [john-users] JTR against 135 millions MD5 hashes)

On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 05:49:00AM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> Also, for saltless hashes we only need one bitmap and one hash table.
> That's for the entire john process.  When its total allocation size is
> multi-gigabyte, spending 272 GiB (if I calculated correctly) on a bitmap
> and a hash table combined is not a problem.  (In fact, I think we should
> introduce even larger bitmaps and hash tables to better handle cases
> like that - this is on my to-do.)  Before the introduction of bitmaps,
> we were spending 1 GiB.

Of course, I meant "272 MiB", not "272 GiB", in the quote above.

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ