Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:11:27 +0800
From: myrice <qqlddg@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: xsha512-cuda & xsha512-opencl testing

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> myrice -
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 02:29:40PM +0800, myrice wrote:
>> HashNum_SaltNum
>> 1_1
>> guesses: 1  time: 0:00:00:01 DONE (Sun Jul 15 12:09:50 2012)  c/s: 499321
>>
>> 100_100
>> guesses: 100  time: 0:00:00:01 DONE (Sun Jul 15 18:18:18 2012)  c/s: 26346K
>
> 1 second is too little time for the c/s rate to reflect anything.
> (1 minute could be OK.)
>

It seems my password are so "simple". Even in incremental mode, it
finished very fast. I have to choose a long and difficult password for
such small test case.

>> 1M_K
>> guesses: 1000000  time: 0:00:10:14 DONE (Sun Jul 15 20:30:56 2012)  c/s: 1260M1M
>
> Running time is OK, but the hashes/salt ratio was changing, and
> non-negligible time might have been spent on processing the successful
> guesses.
>
> Also, what's "1260M1M" - doesn't look like a number to me.  Is this what
> john actually printed?  I doubt it.
>

My mistake. It should be 1260M without 1M...(1M is the next line word)

I will post incremental result soon

Thanks
myrice

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ