[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:03:29 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: My audit of cracker, format, loader.c
On 2012-07-15 18:27, jfoug wrote:
> Cracker.c: All changes appear good.
>
>
>
> Format.c:
>
> - force un-aligned input to salt removed, but this may have been by design.
>
> - the overflow logic of salt and binary buffers was lost in fmt_self_test()
Both these were Jumbo only (by me) and with the not-yet-merged core
changes I believe the extra alignment stuff is not needed at all. The
overflow "canary" logic has never caught one single bug so I though it's
better to stay close to core.
> Loader.c
>
> - Nightmare diff. I will have to look at that, when I have more time, and a
> clear head. But I think there is differences between what used to be in
> jumbo, and now, logic wise. Possibly things that were busted before in
> jumbo are fixed, I do not know. But obviously changes, as shown by the
> prior 2 issues I found there.
When you diff that one to core code, it's simpler to see. Code differs
much less from core now.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
