[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 01:50:04 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Atom: bf P1 asm results (was:Between 1.7.9-jumbo-3 and 1.7.9-jumbo-4 performance of --format=bf dropped by more than 20%)
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 11:32:14PM +0200, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> Without any changes:
>
> $ ./john-1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes --format=bf --test=10
> Benchmarking: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [32/32 X2]... DONE
> Raw: 169 c/s real, 169 c/s virtual
>
> Switching to ASM:
>
> $ ./john-1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes-asm --format=bf --test=10
> Benchmarking: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [32/32]... DONE
> Raw: 215 c/s real, 216 c/s virtual
>
> Switching to the P1 ASM version:
>
> $ ./john-1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes-asm-p1 --format=bf --test=10
> Benchmarking: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [32/32]... DONE
> Raw: 231 c/s real, 232 c/s virtual
Thanks! To make this more specific, can you please post your
/proc/cpuinfo?
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
