Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 20:28:41 -0500
From: "jfoug" <jfoug@....net>
To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: Building bleeding (target linux-x86-clang) fails (gost.h/gost_plug.c)

This one originally had patches for gost and radmin.  I have removed the
radmin, since I think it already patched.

Jim.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: magnum [mailto:john.magnum@...hmail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 7:55 PM
>To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
>Subject: Re: [john-dev] Building bleeding (target linux-x86-clang) fails
>(gost.h/gost_plug.c)
>
>You did not. And Frank's patch was not really in complete patch format
>so I need a patch from either one of you :)
>
>magnum
>
>
>On 2012-07-03 19:57, jfoug wrote:
>> Did I not send the patch??
>>
>>> From: Frank Dittrich [mailto:frank_dittrich@...mail.com]
>>>>
>>>> Can you try this patch (against bleeding).
>>>
>>> Which patch
>>>
>>>> It changes the name from
>>>> __bswap_32() to _Swap_32() before the #define.
>>>
>>> May be we should be even more paranoid, and define _JtR_Swap_32()?
>>
>> That likely would be even better (smarter).  The #define still keeps
>> the real code, looking nice, and using the normal item.  But we can
>> add prefix warts, so that the real functions would never conflict with
>anything.
>>
>> Jim.
>>
>>
>


Download attachment "radmin-and-gost-bugs-bleeding.diff" of type "application/octet-stream" (1479 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.