[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 01:14:51 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Shouldn't the TS work with a pw.dic in reversed order
as well?
On 06/29/2012 12:40 AM, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> On 06/29/2012 12:28 AM, Frank Dittrich wrote:
>> Will repeat the test after make clean..., and with other .dic files
>> reversed as well.
>
> This didn't produce any errors so far for linux-x86-sse2.
> Unfortunately, I deleted the old binary and closed that terminal.
>
> Now I have to repeat the test with all the build targets (OMP/non-OMP)
> on my slow 32bit netbook.
I knew the self test was fast and I definitely didn't spend more than
one minute on it, so I knew this wasn't an OMP build.
With non-OMP linux-x86-clang, I can reproduce the errors.
All dictionary files are with reversed order of candidatepasswords,
compared to the official TS.
$ ./jtrts.pl -q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- JtR-TestSuite (jtrts). Version 1.12.4, June 22, 2012. By, Jim
Fougeron & others
- Testing: John the Ripper password cracker, ver: 1.7.9-jumbo-6-RC0
[linux-x86-clang]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
form=dynamic_2 guesses: 1482 time: 0:00:00:00 :
Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!]
form=dynamic_2-raw guesses: 1482 time: 0:00:00:00 :
Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!]
form=dynamic_3 guesses: 1482 time: 0:00:00:00 :
Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!]
form=dynamic_3-raw guesses: 1482 time: 0:00:00:00 :
Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!]
form=dynamic_34 guesses: 1482 time: 0:00:00:00 :
Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!]
.pot CHK:hmac-sha256 guesses: 1500 time: 0:00:00:08 [PASSED]
(Still running.)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
