[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:12:00 +0200
From: "Andries E. Brouwer" <Andries.Brouwer@....nl>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: raw-sha1_li
> In this format, we 'could' remove the raw-sha1_LI, and simply change
> raw-sha1 to behave like this.
There are two entirely different hashes:
1. raw-sha1
2. raw-sha1 followed by zeroing the first 20 bits
They should have different names since they differ.
For example, the linkedin dump contains the hashes
a96807e7bd710592ee36264a72d6aa35c2d165f9
000007e7bd710592ee36264a72d6aa35c2d165f9
Now sunshine09 has sha1sum
3b1787e7bd710592ee36264a72d6aa35c2d165f9
so that it qualifies for the second hash, but not for the first one.
This means that raw-sha1 and raw-sha1_LI must be kept separate.
It also means that it is a bad idea to call them both $dynamic_26$.
Andries
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
