Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:07:39 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: wordlist dupe suppression

Jim -

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:12:06PM -0500, jfoug wrote:
> I think the buggyness is likely an off by one in the initial computation of
> line count.  I believe that if the file does not end in \n, the line counts
> are correct. If it ends in a \n, then it is 1 larger.  This was a work
> around for a core if there was no trailing \n line (IIRC).  The array of
> line pointers was not large enough.  I thought the line count was corrected,
> after the true load (not the line count check).  It looks like the line
> count check is being used within this part of logging, and to determine if a
> dupe was found or not.

Are you going to correct this?

Thanks,

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.