[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:57:26 -0500
From: "jfoug" <jfoug@....net>
To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: Is strsep() portable enough?
Since it is such a non-critical, speed wise, simply write your own, put it
into the proper place in JtR code, such as in misc.c, where there are some
other useful str functions. I love strtok, but the smashing of contiguous
separator chars is something that I really love/hate. At times it is really
useful. However, most of the times, it is a problem
>From: magnum [mailto:john.magnum@...hmail.com]
>On 2012-06-17 22:11, Frank Dittrich wrote:
>>
>> currently parsing of --markov=... options is done with strtok().
>> I'd prefer using strsep(), to allow something like ...
>> But I am not sure whether strsep() is portable enough.
>> Any opinions?
>
>The man page states it's not standard and a google search for "strsep
>not available" indicates it's not there on Solaris, for a starter. I'm
>not sure but I suppose that means you should not use it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
