[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:53:32 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: bash auto-completion for john
On 05/13/2012 12:26 AM, magnum wrote:
> On 05/12/2012 04:51 AM, Frank Dittrich wrote:
>> $ ./john --list=
>> ? ext-filters hidden-options rules
>> build-info ext-filters-only inc-modes
>> externals ext-modes options
>>
>>
>> "?" and "options" have been added by me. Is that OK?
>
> Until now I thought "options? what does he mean?" but now I got it: That
> is a section (currently only having one subsection, opencl).
Should I remove "option" from the list of possible completions?
I think I'll just drop it.
I doubt anybody currently needs this, so it will only be confusing.
> So to
> really cover all bases, we should have a --list=sections, right?
Currently probably nobody ever needs this.
And if --markov mode gets enhanced in a way that it additionally
supports --markov=section, I can still use
./john --list=Options.Markov 2>/dev/null or something similar to find
the existing [Options.Markov:name] sections...
Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
