[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:56:35 +0100
From: Samuele Giovanni Tonon <samu@...uxasylum.net>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: RAR format finally proper
On 03/06/12 19:47, magnum wrote:
> On 03/06/2012 11:54 AM, Samuele Giovanni Tonon wrote:
>> On 03/06/12 01:16, magnum wrote:
>>>
>>> We still need OpenCL of course. Samuele, hit it! :-)
>>
>> unfortunately i'm stuck at work a lot of time at the moment
>> and i don't want to block anyone willing to do that; so
>> if anyone is interested in the opencl version feel free
>> to come and do that i don't want to lock it .
>
> I'll give it a try just to start learning OpenCL but I don't expect it
> to end up in something committable :)
>
> The current SHA1 code only does one block, right? I will need one more
> like the OpenSSL ones, with update().
rather than the update() part which in the end is just an append, it's
missing the code for strings more than 64 byte long by changing properly
the 5 IV; need to say that from some test i did in C the update part
seems the one that is crucial in rar.
Cheers
Samuele
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
