[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:59:42 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Dragonfly BSD SHA2
On 01/18/2012 11:08 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:06:41AM +0100, magnum wrote:
>> The 32-bit DragonFly formats are now confirmed correct for hashes from a
>> real system.
>> I suppose I need to make two separate formats for the 64-bit versions.
>
> Yes. I think they can share the same source files with the 32-bit
> formats, but provide extra format structs.
64-bit versions are now supported. They share source files but show up
as different formats, eg. dragonfly3-32 vs dragonfly3-64 (where 3
obviously stands for $3$, ie. SHA-256). When auto-loading, 64-bit gets
precedence.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
