[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:36:23 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Recent CVS patches [was: Recent github patches]
On 01/13/2012 07:30 PM, magnum wrote:
> Maybe I'll start a "jumbo-bleeding" branch on GitHub, being latest CVS
> core + latest Jumbo patches.
There is now such a branch on GutHub. There are a couple of issues that
popped up due to the new alignments and self tests. This is probably a
good thing and I'll look into them but right now I don't really get how
things are supposed to go together. Take for example BFEgg:
It fails with "FAILED (binary)" because the binary is misaligned. But
that is because fmt_default_binary just pass the ciphertext pointer, so
if something is misaligned it's not because of BFEgg - or is it? And
who/what says BFEgg needs alignment in the first place? I believe it
doesn't.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
