Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 18:52:39 -0500
From: "JimF" <jfoug@....net>
To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: Problems with the 0007 patch

From: "magnum" <rawsmooth@...dband.net>

>I do not think your fix was busted, it was just fixed for the case of xBuf 
>!= 1
>
> So if your fix ever worked for sequential buffers (xBuf=1), it will now 
> also work for interleaved ones.

Now that I have had a chance to unwind, and actaully look at the patches, I 
see what I had missed when writing them the first time.  Yes, your fixes are 
correct.

> I'm more worried about the 0010 patch. Did that break something? I *think* 
> it should not.


I have not had a chance to look at 0010 other than looking at the patch 
code.  It appears good.

I wonder if this would be applicable to mscash1, or any other 'fast' format?

Jim 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux - Powered by OpenVZ