[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 22:30:25 +0200
From: magnum <rawsmooth@...dband.net>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: ETA for incremental
On 2011-06-06 21:52, jfoug wrote:
>> From: magnum
>> Good idea. As another alternative, I guess it would be easy to replace
>> the "100.00%" with "DONE" instead, like this:
>>
>> guesses: 0 time: 0:00:00:06 DONE (Mon Jun 6 19:03:01 2011) c/s:23055M
>
> I like the above format a lot. I think this is more intuitive, but to each
> his own.
>
>> This will work in case we have no ETA too:
>>
>> guesses: 0 time: 0:00:00:06 DONE c/s:23055M
>
> Having the actual date/time of completion is very nice. I personally think
> it is very useful. Often, I run a batch (script) file with many smaller
> runs in it. It is nice to track amount of time actually used, and date they
> completed.
Ah, of course - we should output the ending time even if we did not have
ETA during the run! Definitely doable.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
