[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 03:24:24 +0200
From: Łukasz Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: sha256 format patches
>Right, but your current code will likely bump into another bottleneck
>first. I think it already does on my system.
You might be right.
>> Slow sha256 calculates 380 c/s - 35kB/s PCI-e transfer
>I think you wrongly substituted the on-CPU speed here (not GPU), but
>that didn't affect your conclusion.
That's my mistke it should be around 2500 c/s as on the bottom of my post.
I also was wrong about 64bit integers in cuda (nv is not boasting of
it). According to this document
http://developer.download.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/3_0/toolkit/docs/ptx_isa_2.0.pdf
- page 64, this should't be a problem.
Bitslice implementation looks very interesting. I'll do further research on it.
oclHashcat results are impressive.
Thanks for *1mod.diff !
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
