[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 04:22:21 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: crypt-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: alternative approach
Yuri -
I asked:
> > How large was the reduction? Can you also try simple "a ^ b" (no mask)
> > and simple "a + b", and report the LUT counts for all four (original
> > full pcadd(), your "a ^ b ^ mask", and these two I suggested)? These
> > numbers might give us some hints.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:10:27PM -0300, Yuri Gonzaga wrote:
> Ok. I have uploaded a pdf file reporting the 4 cases' results here:
> http://bit.ly/iLaZQB
This shows two things:
1. The smallest LUT count is for the original pcadd(), contrary to what
you had said.
2. All four LUT counts are a lot higher than those you had reported for
bflike. Are they for something else?
Can you perhaps share the corresponding four pieces of code as well?
Thanks,
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
