[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 23:48:18 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: crypt-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Bcrypt functionalities implementation in hardware
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 04:08:13PM -0300, Yuri Gonzaga wrote:
> >
> > BTW, there appears to be an error in the original bcrypt paper. I think
> > actual implementations have the two ExpandKey() calls in the loop
> > swapped. Did you also notice this? Or am I wrong?
>
> Yes. I have noticed when looked in the actual implementation.
> In the paper, as I put on the email, the first call is done with salt as
> parameter while the second one is with key.
> On the other hand, on the implementation, this sequence is inverted, isn't
> it?
Yes, this is what I meant.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux -
Powered by OpenVZ
