[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 23:57:38 +0000 (UTC)
From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@...bsd.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, Leah Neukirchen <leah@...u.org>,
libc-alpha@...rceware.org, Richard Russon <rich@...tcap.org>
Subject: Re: gcvt(3) should be MT-Safe, AS-Safe, AC-Safe
Alejandro Colomar dixit:
>The BSDs don't seem to document it as being AS-safe either. NetBSD
>mentions the existence of snprintf_ss(3), but nothing about dprintf(3).
>FreeBSD is silent. OpenBSD is silent too.
Huh? https://man.openbsd.org/signal.3 not enough?
bye,
//mirabilos
--
[...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but
what about xfs, and if only i had waited until reiser4 was ready... in the be-
ginning, there was ffs, and in the middle, there was ffs, and at the end, there
was still ffs, and the sys admins knew it was good. :) -- Ted Unangst über *fs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
